On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 02:15:19 -0700, "Matthew Brown" <morven(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
The opposition at least in my case is about how far
some people and
corporations will go to claim copyright (or trademark, or indeed
patent, although the latter doesn't affect Wikipedia nearly so much)
in ways that range from laughable through questionable and dubious to
unlikely.
Oh sure. I recently handled a complaint from someone who claimed that
sales figures for a product which he quoted on his website were
copyright, and we may not reproduce the figures. That is clearly
complete bollocks. On the other hand we had someone complaining that
a formatted list of tour dates was a direct lift out of his book. He
was right; it was a direct lift.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG