On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 22:11:30 +0200, "MacGyverMagic/Mgm"
<macgyvermagic(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It's also pretty clear that the majority of
articles can't exist with some
form of protection.
Most of them were vandalized when they were left unprotected.
Assuming you mean without, then yes, it's a decent confirmation that
the balance between protectionists and editists is being struck at
roughly the right level.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG