On 4/6/07, Vee <vee.be.me(a)gmail.com> wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/…
"
1. *Strong oppose* per many of the above,
WP:OFFICE<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:OFFICE>is the antithesis of
consensus
building <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:CON>, which is the heart of
Wikipedia. Danny was the tool that implimented this vicious and
unfeeling
policy. He's made his decisions, and those decisions are inconsistent
with
adminship.
??? I think I just lost what little faith I had in the RfA system. How
dare
Danny stop us from getting sued!
Also, what's with the trend of writing 'strong', 'firm', etc before
votes?
Does it actually add more weight to your opinion?
While we're complaining about illogical votes, I found it incredibly odd for
someone supporting to write "Danny = WP. WP = Danny." Perhaps it was just an
ill-phrased comment, but I think it's dangerous to equate the project with
any one person. Let's not go overboard, shall we?
Johnleemk