Daniel R. Tobias wrote:
On 3 Apr 2007 at 08:17, "David Gerard"
<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
You're slipping into something resembling
Copyright Paranoia For Convenience.
"It's a copyright violation *and* it's original research. Probably
violates a patent too, if I looked closely enough."
And a trademark.
The various manufacturers certainly own the trademarks for their
respective products. I'm surprised that Guy is not arguing for
trademark violation.
Ec