G'day David,
*Ducks for cover* the '3 admins request' you
suggested would mean that
we end up with very few admins left - recent wheelwars have occured
(where more than 3 admins were involved in each side) where both sides
would be happy to use this procedure to desysop each other. I do think
we need to make it easier to desysop 'screw process'/'screw consensus'
admins, but making it a '3 admins request' would a) Make spurious
desysoppings far too easy and b) Lead to charges of cabalism - why
should admins only hold office at the pleasure of OTHER ADMIMS?
0) As a "screw process" admin, I wonder what leads you to believe my
quick'n'easy de-sysopping is necessary.
1) There are not "screw consensus" admins. There *are* admins who
disagree with certain wikilawyers about what "consensus" means, but
then that's hardly their fault.
I think what you *meant* is that we need to make it easier to desysop
people who abuse their privileges or are otherwise bad admins, and I
agree entirely.
Cheers,
--
Mark Gallagher
"What? I can't hear you, I've got a banana on my head!"
- Danger Mouse
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/298 - Release Date: 30/03/2006