charles matthews stated for the record:
>"Steve Bennett" wrote
>
>
>
>>And notice that my example was objective: "naked breasts".
>>Yours is subjective: "offensive". Kind of logical that a subjective
>>term is hard to apply objectively.
>
>
>Naked breasts - the last thing young kids should be exposed to. No, wait.
>The first thing young kids should be exposed to. No, wait, the breasts
>should be exposed to the kid, but one at a time. Good thing newborns have
>good enough grasp of subjectivity and objectivity not to be confused. Or
>offended. No wait, they grasp fingers, but I think they don't really grasp
>... never mind, the confusion seems to lie elsewhere ...
>
>Charles
Charles, Charles, Charles. That is such a straw man. Everyone knows
that it is (are?) only pert, young, virginal breasts that kids must not
see. It is perfectly all right to expose children to breasts (or vice
versa) /as long as they are lactating/ (the breasts, not the children).
Contributor to Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
"We make the internet not suck" - Jimbo Wales
Public key: