-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
charles matthews stated for the record:
"Steve Bennett" wrote
And notice that my example was objective:
"naked breasts".
Yours is subjective: "offensive". Kind of logical that a subjective
term is hard to apply objectively.
Naked breasts - the last thing young kids should be exposed to. No, wait.
The first thing young kids should be exposed to. No, wait, the breasts
should be exposed to the kid, but one at a time. Good thing newborns have
good enough grasp of subjectivity and objectivity not to be confused. Or
offended. No wait, they grasp fingers, but I think they don't really grasp
... never mind, the confusion seems to lie elsewhere ...
Charles
Charles, Charles, Charles. That is such a straw man. Everyone knows
that it is (are?) only pert, young, virginal breasts that kids must not
see. It is perfectly all right to expose children to breasts (or vice
versa) /as long as they are lactating/ (the breasts, not the children).
/me goes to see what [[fetish]] has to say about the subject.
- --
Sean Barrett | The other side to the Wikipedia that nobody really
sean(a)epoptic.org | likes to talk about... is that a large portion of
| the content is fairly pornographic, and actually
| quite lewd. --Encyclopedia Britannica spokesman
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEKrXoMAt1wyd9d+URAijpAJ43xXBrH7SKVKD07kPbpzBuV1QxLQCfSOXB
bRIunQSZQdpZA1v8o4NqBPw=
=aY8M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----