There is an 'artistic' tag - so the Michelangelo's David image would be
tagged as 'images of naked buttocks' and 'this material appears in an
artistic context'
Cynical
Mark Wagner wrote:
On 3/27/06, Sam Korn <smoddy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/27/06, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/27/06, Sam Korn <smoddy(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/27/06, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelangelo%27s_David
>
> Does this one contain naked buttocks:
>
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Donatello_david_plaster_replica_right_10…
>
What would most internet filtering software packages say?
No idea. Who cares? If we want to do this we would want to do a
reasonable job.
Well, if the idea of tagging is to work with internet filtering
packages, as I presume it is, finding out what works best with them
would not be a bad idea in the slightest.
The last time I looked into this, what works best with internet
filtering packages is broad-brush yes-or-no labeling designed to keep
kids away from pornography and other subjects that could lead to
awkward questions. In short, we could reasonably use it to keep kids
away from Wikipedia entirely, or for the better software, [[List of
sex positions]], but it can't provide the fine control to selectively
block one or the other of (note: neither image particularly work-safe)
[[Image:Human-woman.png]] and [[Image:Mass Grave Bergen Belsen May
1945.jpg]].
--
Mark
[[User:Carnildo]]
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l