On 3/27/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
Someone has taken to slapping {fact} and {weasel} all
over the
criticisms, which is understandable enough since the rebuttals all
come from primary sources. Any decent suggestion on how to prune it
down to an appropriate length and keep it that way would be
appreciated.
Guy (JzG)
Formatting. Just as I create subsections when I want other editors to
expand on sections, do the opposite if you don't want that. So, trim a
whole section down into a bullet point, headed with "the three most
well-known claims are the following".
The 'weasel' tag is pretty silly - there's not even consensus that
weasel words are particularly bad. It should be deprecated in favour
of {fact} or something.
Steve