Mikkerpikker wrote:
We don't
"prove" anything. We just take his claim out of the article.
Ryan
I think the point is we *can't* simply take the claim out because it
satisfies [[WP:V]]. And since there are no rebuttals that does satisfy
[[WP:V]] the article in question becomes POV by virtue of the fact
that there are no views cited to challenge it.
That's not logical. If there are no views expressed that challenge the
premise, it necessarily represents the Neutral Point of View. A
rebutting argument that is not verifiable is as good as no argument at all.
Ec