On 24 Mar 2006, at 00:32, Jesse W wrote:
On Mar 23, 2006, at 3:19 PM, Ilmari Karonen wrote:
Jesse W wrote:
On Mar 23, 2006, at 11:04 AM, Mark Wagner wrote:
On 3/22/06, Jesse W <jessw(a)netwood.net>
wrote:
> It's also important to note that 95% of the images on the english
> wikipedia do have tags (although many may be wrong, it's true).
I haven't checked already-tagged images, but new uploads (based on
the
data at
http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-March/
041534.html)
have at least a 40% error rate for tagging.
OK. That is an issue.
Indeed. So the house is almost clean now. It's only the
underside of
the carpet that's dirty. :-(
Well, that's progress... Having gigantic
piles of dirt lining the
hallways, and dirt on the walls, and the roof, is worse than having
dirt under the carpet. Yes, we need to deal with the dirt under the
carpet, too, but we have still made progress.
No, we have just put up signs saying "dirt".
The whole idea of the classification was to then delete 90%+ of it
(if you read Jimbo's original comments).
Free encyclopaedia anyone?
Fair use content is not free content.
Justinc