[WikiEN-l] "Fatally Flawed" -- Internal Britannica ReviewTackles Nature Methods

[charles matthews]

"Stephen Bain" wrote

> I'm sure they have real concerns, and I'm also sure that there are
> probably more errors in WP than in EB. The point is that WP can fix
> its errors far more quickly than traditional encyclopaedias, and we
> should use this opportunity to show that.

It would be cool to manoeuvre EB into fact-checking our articles.  With 
enough EBs, any error is shallow, to coin a phrase.

Charles