[WikiEN-l] "Fatally Flawed" -- Internal Britannica Review Tackles Nature Methods

[Mathias Schindler]

On 3/22/06, SJ <2.718281828 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Below is a letter that Britannica sent out today to some of its
> customers, in response to the December Nature article comparing the
> accuracy of articles in Wikipedia and Britannica.  A more detailed
> review of the Nature study, including responses to each alleged error
> and omission, is linked from the front page of www.eb.com.

I've added a collection of news items on this subject at
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications_subcommittees/Press/2006/03/22_Britanica_PR#Web_sites_that_have_reported_this_refutation_paper_from_EBI

Feel free to add more if new ones appear.