[WikiEN-l] "Fatally Flawed" -- Internal Britannica Review Tackles Nature Methods

Nick Boalch n.g.boalch at durham.ac.uk
Wed Mar 22 19:09:36 UTC 2006


SJ wrote:
> Below is a letter that Britannica sent out today to some of its
> customers, in response to the December Nature article comparing the
> accuracy of articles in Wikipedia and Britannica.

It might be interesting to invite Nature to do a new comparison -- this
time of our response to their article [1] with Britannica's [2]...

Cheers,

N.

[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_peer_review/Nature_December_2005/Errors
[2] http://corporate.britannica.com/britannica_nature_response.pdf

-- 
Nicholas Boalch
School of Modern Languages & Cultures       Tel: +44 (0) 191 334 3456
University of Durham                        Fax: +44 (0) 191 334 3421
New Elvet, Durham DH1 3JT, UK               WWW: http://nick.frejol.org/




More information about the WikiEN-l mailing list