[WikiEN-l] Verifiability - Case Study I

[charles matthews]

Slim Virgin wrote

> Correct. Wikipedia editors are not journalists and have no access to
> the kind of fact-checking process that reporters have. This is why we
> publish only what reliable sources have already published.
>
> However, even though the e-mail exchange is not acceptable as a
> source, there is likely to be some other way of obtaining the
> information e.g. from a school magazine or local newspaper. It'll just
> require a bit of extra digging.

Well, you're assuming here that the problem is actual _verification_.

No one seriously believes that schooling information in London would not be 
verifiable.

My interest here is rather in people's behaviour.  The user who cut the 
information has, in my view, made numerous mistakes.  Since the 
Verifiability policy will not in any case prevent the making of mistakes, 
here's the question to the class.

User:81.157.14.152 didn't follow best practice here.  Enumerate the ways in 
which best practice was not followed.

Charles