On 23/07/06, ScottL <scott(a)mu.org> wrote:
I have seen a number of cases where (usually as a
way to resolve a
protracted content dispute) all criticism or dissenting views are first
segregated into a section on criticism and then later removed to a
totally different article with no summary of that article left in the
original.
This wouldn't be done with a "History" section, so shouldn't be done
with a "Criticisms" section.
--
Oldak Quill (oldakquill(a)gmail.com)