On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 05:50:38 +0100, "Tony Sidaway" <f.crdfa(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
When it comes to biographical articles, however, and
particularly
those about living people, everything should be referenced.
So what do we do with [[Lance Armstrong]]? All the insinuations about
doping are sourced, it's just that (a) they are circumstantial and (b)
he has already successfully sued one newspaper for implying that they
are true. Every time we point out that he is technically and legally
innocent, a number of "balancing" facts implying the opposite are
added. I am seriously concerned about this. Should I be?
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG