On 7/18/06, Anthony <wikilegal(a)inbox.org> wrote:
Absolutely. Of course that can't happen as long
as the system
continues to be overriden by your edict. And no, don't bring up that
there was already an AfD - that AfD was on completely different
content from the new article.
I would support a modification of Jimmy's "edict" to the effect that
an indefinitely semi-protected article on BP would be subject to
regular community processes. Indefinite semi-protection would be an
expression of the belief that more harm (unsubstantiated rumors,
vandalism) is likely to come from having this particular article
edited by unregistered users and very new ones, than productive edits.
This, however, is an untested hypothesis. Is there any existing
article or set of articles which is highly comparable to BP, where we
could verify whether such a trend of inaccuracy/vandalism does indeed
exist?
Erik