Hi,
There is of course [[WP:GA]] but it's very painful to nominate an
article at the moment - you have to add a template to the article talk
page, edit the GA page, potentially edit a template referenced in the
GA page, and update the count at the top of GA. Simply to say that
IMHO this article is "not bad".
Is there a list of reviewing proposals anywhere? I had a thought for
one today whereby any user with at least 100 edits can add a review to
any page they have never edited, giving scores out of 5 for
comprehensiveness, sourcing, NPOV, and MoS adherence. Not a very
thoroughly thought-through thought though...:)
(wow...what a last sentence...it must be late...)
Steve
On 1/31/06, SJ <2.718281828(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Nice is right; I love this discussion. We should
start a proper
article improvement project, run spot checks like this every few
weeks, highlight 'good articles' and not just FAs, have regular ref
and stub fixing contests...