There's a pile of discussion on WP:ANI on this
case. There's been a
pile of socks after DreamGuy for a while, and when Elonka started as
well, several admins (me included) presumed this was another one. This
probably isn't the case. Someone else has dropped the block to a week.
I've exchanged email with Elonka on the matter, and strongly suggested
that the abovelinked page be removed or severely toned down if she
wants a happier involvement in general with Wikipedia.
ps: I'm probably about that famous, but I don't state a claim of such
every breath I take. I'm just picturing WMC or someone doing that sort
of thing ... nah.
How come we're blaming her all of a sudden? We're the ones who
screwed up. The predominant culture on Wikipedia is really good at
pissing off good-faith contributors sometimes--I'm often loath to ask
others to contribute because I know how they'll ultimately be treated.
Here's someone who openly states on her page that she wants to help
Wikipedia, but she wants the personal attacks against her removed
before that happens. If you step back and look at it from her point
of view, and not through the lens of the Wikipedia culture, is that
really so unreasonable?
--
Philip L. Welch
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Philwelch