Empowering David to look at a discussion and say
"What the hell are
you smoking," then to make a sane decision, on the other hand, does
make sense.
Certainly. And he already has that power, I'd encourage him to use it.
Though if the objective is to build a friendlier, more polite AfD then
"what the hell are you smoking" might not be the best phrase :)
Particularly when you figure he would mostly not look
into uncontroversial things in the first place.
A lot of the deletions Tony and others have been raising issues about were
uncontroversial at the time they went through AfD. Nomination,
'''delete''', '''delete''',
'''delete''' and it's gone.
Controversial things usually get kept the way the system is designed,
though I admit that there are exceptions.
Regards,
Haukur