[WikiEN-l] Pointless deletions, bogus guidelines

[Alphax (Wikipedia email)]

geni wrote:
> On 1/21/06, Tony Sidaway <f.crdfa at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>On 1/19/06, John Lee <johnleemk at gawab.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Tony has been arguing that the deletion process is borked. That, I think
>>>we can all agree on, even if we disagree on how it's broken. However,
>>>that's not licence to wholly ignore it,
>>
>>
>>Welll, I'd say that it's a very good reason to use your noggin and
>>reverse its most egregiously borked decisions. Something that you may
>>have noticed some of us are quite adept at doing.  Looks like Jimmy
>>Wales took a leaf from our book! :)
> 
> 
> Not really. Your recent record only looks good compared to your out of
> process deletion record.
> 

The only time when process should take priority over common sense is
when dealing with the laws of physics.

-- 
Alphax - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphax
Contributor to Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
"We make the internet not suck" - Jimbo Wales
Public key: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphax/OpenPGP
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 556 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/attachments/20060121/5d79af4c/attachment.pgp