Perhaps, but I don't see many articles being
nominated for AfD with the
reason that it's a bad quality article. It might well be so. But the
reason is usually, hoax, nonsense, or the most popular one "non notable".
AfD gets a lot of rotten press here and much of it is richly deserved. But
it's not completely hostile. Look at this little tale.
On January 8th a new user created the article [[Three cards and a top
hat]] with this content:
"Suppose you have three cards: one that is red on both sides, a second
that is white on both sides, and a third that is red on one side and white
on the other. The puzzles is this: Put all of the cards in the hat pull
one put and look at one side. Given that that side is red, what is the
probability the other side is also red."
Half an hour later the articles was, unsusurprisingly, on AfD. Four days
on it has grown into a substantial piece and will probably be kept.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_cards_and_a_top_hat
It's "mathcruft" or "puzzlecruft" but once a reasonably decent
article is
there we just can't bring ourselves to delete it.
Regards,
Haukur
Mind you, I don't spend that much time on AfD so I
could be missing a lot.
Garion
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l