From: wikien-l-bounces(a)Wikipedia.org
[mailto:wikien-l-bounces@Wikipedia.org] On Behalf Of Fastfission
Taking care of these issues as *general* issues and
not
related to one specific fad is the way to extinguish whatever
actual problems there are without being idiosyncratic and
draconian about it.
Seems to me that userboxes are the symptom, rather than the cause, of a
certain malaise in Wikipedia.
I'd like to see moves toward encouragement and co-operation, rather than
demonisation.
If frivolous userboxes are causing a load on the server that noticably slows
down the site for everybody, then that is cause to act with speed and
authority, but short of that, any high-handed remedy is merely going to fuel
the fire.
If people are using Wikipedia to play rather than build an encyclopaedia,
then they should be encouraged in this primary objective, not castigated for
extraneous activies, because for every frivolous userbox, I dare say if I
went looking, I could find some other piece of useless guff on the user
pages of experienced editors. Let people play, if it does no harm and they
are participating in community activities, but also encourage them to be
more productive.
On
BookCrossing.com, we have a couple of numbers that appear after the names
of users, and these show the level of participation in the general activity
of the site. Perhaps it might be useful to add in some numbers after
Wikipedia names, and I'd suggest number of edits in articlespace and length
of membership in days, which would show at a glance a rough idea of how
valuable a particular editor is. If that doesn't put too much load on the
servers, that is.
Peter (Skyring)