On 1/6/06, Sam Korn <smoddy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 1/6/06, Chris Jenkinson <chris(a)starglade.org>
wrote:
The point of these templates is that they are
short and simple to use.
If they are subst:'d in, they become more complicated. Why do we need to
do this?
Benefit to the servers. Avoidable use of templates should be avoided,
and substitution is an easy way of doing that. Creating slightly ugly
code is unfortunate but inevitable.
Is there template syntax to force a template to always subst: in? If
not, it might be a good idea.
-Matt