[WikiEN-l] Worthy admins? (was "The userbox fad")

[geni]

On 1/3/06, Steve Bennett <stevage at gmail.com> wrote:
> What's strange to me is that it seems that WP is one of the few places
> where you could really provide a comprehensive CV of all the good you've
> done and why you should be admin.  Why not ask candidates to provide X
> diffs demonstrating their dispute resolution skills, and invite
> nay-sayers to provide diffs of bad judgement? Simple statistics should
> mandatorily be collected which would show roughly what sort of Wikipedia
> member they are: How many different talk pages have they left comments
> on? How many user talk pages have they left 2 or more comments on? How
> long have they been active? What is their activity pattern? How many
> edits have all the people voting for them made?
>
> I like stats!
>
> Steve
>


Dispute resolution is not an admin task
Dispute resolution is not an admin task
Dispute resolution is not an admin task
Dispute resolution is not an admin task
Dispute resolution is not an admin task
Dispute resolution is not an admin task
Dispute resolution is not an admin task
Dispute resolution is not an admin task
Dispute resolution is not an admin task
Dispute resolution is not an admin task
Dispute resolution is not an admin task
Dispute resolution is not an admin task
Dispute resolution is not an admin task
Dispute resolution is not an admin task
Dispute resolution is not an admin task
Dispute resolution is not an admin task

People keep seem to be forgeting this.

--
geni