Ok, I retract that, was a little overstated. Although I've seen way to many
items brought to DRV in the past just to have another go at them (generally
in the case of xfd's ended in Keep).
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Gerard" <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
To: "English Wikipedia" <wikien-l(a)wikipedia.org>
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] OK, so DRV *is* broken
On 29/12/06, xaosflux <xaosflux(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Last I checked, DRV is NOT AFD part2, and should
not be involved with
content based decisions, just proceedural / consensus measuring ones.
No, that's completely and insanely wrong. It is indeed supposed to
review the decision and discussion and content and everything.
- d.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l