On 12/12/06, George Herbert <george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/12/06, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
[[Scholars for 9/11 Truth]] is a significant
indication of the problem.
What is wrong with that page?
No idea I haven't read it isn't relvivant to my point. My point out
there is that there are CTs produceing a large amount of citable
material. Most the the active oponents (such as the author of "screw
loose change") who are the ones who acutaly write down the point by
point debunkings tend not to produce the same amount of citable
material.
--
geni