Concerned Wikipedian wrote:
MONGO has had to put up with every kind of harassment
you could think of; by
definition of [[WP:HA]], a number of users that have forced him into his
mental decline should have been blocked and/or banned ages ago.
As someone who came extremely close to throwing in the towel because of
Mongo's continued abuses and incivility, at some point something has to
give. He went through some serious shit with the ED stuff, and ArbCom
gave him a pass for going overboard. When he continues to do it, he
should keep getting the free pass?
I certainly hope not.
I can only think of maybe two administrators at this point who have a
poorer record in similar regards to Mongo, and two others that were
worse resigned not too long ago. This needed to happen a while ago, and
I was surprised when I saw the proposed decisions this week, because
I've been building my own separate case for when I had some significant
time to work on it.
The question you must ask yourself, in the spirit of
IAR: If this decision
will be detrimental to improving or maintaining Wikipedia more than the
opposite decision will be, ignore it. You made this official policy on
August 19, 2006 stating "IAR is policy, always has been". I feel that this
is as good a time as any to apply its' principle.
Don't believe the hype. Mongo does great things for NPOV and for
defending some terrible POV pushers at the 9/11 articles. But that
doesn't excuse him.
-Jeff
--
Name: Jeff Raymond
E-mail: jeff.raymond(a)internationalhouseofbacon.com
WWW:
http://www.internationalhouseofbacon.com
IM: badlydrawnjeff
Quote: "As the hobbits are going up Mount Doom, the
Eye of Mordor is being drawn somewhere else."
- Sen. Rick Santorum on the war in Iraq.