"Thomas Dalton" write
You've
just answered your own question.
Getting lucky is hardly a good method of verifying something... If it
can't be verified promptly then we have a problem.
But Cunc dealt with this. 'Verifiable' is an in-principle thing. It is distinct
from saying everyone can do homebrew fact-checking on anything mentioned. Verifiability on
Wikipedia can't simply be a sceptics' charter: that really would be a problem.
Charles
-----------------------------------------
Email sent from
www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
Visit
www.ntlworld.com/security for more information