[WikiEN-l] Wheel warring

[Sean Barrett]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

jayjg stated for the record:

> No, what the second admin should do is discuss the case with the first
> admin, rather than unblocking.  Maybe the first admin has evidence
> that the second admin is unaware of.  If the second admin has
> conclusive evidence, then the first admin will undoubtedly unblock. If
> not, then there is a dispute, and the second admin should not wheel
> war.  In any event, admins should not act under the bad faith
> supposition that *they know better*; that is what starts the wheel
> war.
> 
> Jay.

The statement "if the second admin has conclusive evidence, then the
first admin will undoubtedly unblock" has been recently demonstrated to
be untrue -- the conclusive evidence that Eloquence is not a danger to
the project is patent, yet Danny (first admin) reverted my (second
admin's) unblocking.

- --
 Sean Barrett     | Power corrupts. Atomic power corrupts atomically.
 sean at epoptic.org |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFES9sTMAt1wyd9d+URAkXEAJ96AaGa9/XVQXWQ/u9hh9ybMf5PPgCcChJZ
JNrExuNcIQg2G5E9Gz0DW78=
=05M3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----