[WikiEN-l] Another tricky "acceptable source" question

[Steve Bennett]

On 18/04/06, Guettarda <guettarda at gmail.com> wrote:
> If it's published, it should count.  "Easily available" isn't a criterion.
> Is it likely to be in university libraries?  Is it something that
> professionals in the field are likely to have?  Then it easily meets WP:V,
> IMO

Likely? I'm not sure. They could probably track down a copy with a bit
of effort. But yeah, I suppose it is "verifiable", with full citation
details.

Thanks for the replies!

Steve