[WikiEN-l] LS Studio and pro-pedophilia pov

[Jimmy Wales]

Ryan Delaney wrote:
> This is a kind of weird verifiability case. We don't say "God exists" in
> Wikipedia because such a
> statement couldn't be verified. But the statements in [[LS Studio]] could be
> verified if someone got
> their hands on an FBI report on the organization or somesuch. Since no one
> has yet, nothing in
> the article is verifiable... so do we delete it?

I think we absolutely should delete it, if it is as unverifiable as
people are saying.

This could be done in multiple steps, if that would help.

First, remove all unverifiable statements from the article.  Insist
firmly on the talk page that nothing goes back into the article without
a solid site to a mainstream publication.

Second, after a couple of weeks of demonstrating that there is therefore
nothing to be said, AfD would be appropriate and likely to succeed.

--Jimbo



-- 
#######################################################################
#    Office: 1-727-231-0101       |  Free Culture and  Free Knowledge #
#    http://www.wikipedia.org     |     Building a free world         #
#######################################################################