[WikiEN-l] Deleting the Lolicon picture

[Alphax (Wikipedia email)]

Ben McIlwain wrote:
> Steve Bennett wrote:
>> On 4/8/06, David Alexander Russell <webmaster at davidarussell.co.uk> wrote:
>>> So, in other words, we need an accepted definition for what constitutes
>>> deletable child porn on Wikipedia. Something like
>>>
>>> Any image, whether a photograph, drawing, or render, which depicts
>>> minors engaged in sexual activity or sexually suggestive poses.
>>
>> Let's be stronger: Any image containing:
>> - elements of erotica,
>> - and depictions of people, real or fictitious, apparently under 18.
>>
>> I don't really see the argument for being inclusionist. Keeping
>> borderline cases causes us problems, and causes us to have to justify
>> those inclusions.
> 
> Your criteria are ridiculous.  You know how much perfectly legal anime
> (which airs on Cartoon Network, among other things) you just made
> "illegal" with your broad brush stroke?
> 
> Am I the only one who finds it ludicrous to talk about whether a drawn
> image on a piece of paper looks like it is depicting someone over the
> age of 18?!
> 

I agree. We're very rapidly heading towards a slippery slope...

-- 
Alphax - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphax
Contributor to Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
"We make the internet not suck" - Jimbo Wales
Public key: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphax/OpenPGP

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 554 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/attachments/20060409/94721be3/attachment.pgp