[WikiEN-l] Deleting the Lolicon picture

[Mark Gallagher]

G'day Steve,

> On 4/8/06, David Alexander Russell <webmaster at davidarussell.co.uk> wrote:
> 
>>So, in other words, we need an accepted definition for what constitutes
>>deletable child porn on Wikipedia. Something like
>>
>>Any image, whether a photograph, drawing, or render, which depicts
>>minors engaged in sexual activity or sexually suggestive poses.
> 
> Let's be stronger: Any image containing:
> - elements of erotica,
> - and depictions of people, real or fictitious, apparently under 18.
> 
> I don't really see the argument for being inclusionist. Keeping
> borderline cases causes us problems, and causes us to have to justify
> those inclusions.

Hmm.  Where does a screenshot from /Lolita/ stand under this criteria?


(Having neither read the book nor seen the movies, I apologise if this 
question is irrelevant.)

-- 
Mark Gallagher
"What?  I can't hear you, I've got a banana on my head!"
- Danger Mouse


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.0/305 - Release Date: 8/04/2006