On Apr 7, 2006, at 5:40 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
I'm not convinced there's much reason to
include *any* images of *any*
sex acts, involving children or otherwise. Does Britannica?
We're not just trying to replace Britannica; we're trying to replace
specialized encyclopedias as well. I'm sure that an encyclopedia of
sexual behavior would include sketches of varying sexual positions
much like our own.
--
Philip L. Welch
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Philwelch