MacGyverMagic/Mgm wrote:
AFD may have had a concensus when it was deleted, but
editors (even
the ones voting on AFD) are fallible and if like with the professor
case, they are not fully aware of certain facts they can make bad
decisions. Just because procedure was followed, it shouldn't be
automatically assumed, the concensus was correct.
If additional info comes to light on a subject, undeletion should be considered.
And how is a person who did not see the original article supposed to
know if his information is "additional"?
Ec