On 10/2/05, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/2/05, Tony Sidaway <f.crdfa(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Quite. All of these failings could be addressed
in a five-day AfD-like
process where 100 articles are listed at random and either improved to
presentable standard or, if consensus exists to reject, marked as in
need of
attention.
Your idea runs into the problem (that inclusionism makes worse) that
people want to write about stuff they are interested in.
This isn't a problem. It's what has made English Wikipedia one of the
largest reference works in the English language.
Articles on subjects in which nobody shows any interest should probably not
be on our main page.