On 11/29/05, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I concur that, if this is
significant, we should write about it. But we should not write about
it simply to make a political point, not publish it simply to make
that point. There will, after all, be no shortage of copies of it
hosted around the world to refer to.
This is in the end I think the proper "Wikipedia" solution to
anything: write an article about the memo, the controversy, the
attempt to stifle, hell even include some mainstream speculation about
what its contents may be (properly attributed, of course).
FF