On 11/28/05, John Lee <johnleemk(a)gawab.com> wrote:
Minor nit-pick: that situation is improbable because
IIRC the brochure
(if it used GFDL material) has to include the whole whopping GFDL
licence in it.
Which is why releasing a picture under the GFDL is de facto a
Wikipedia-only license. There have been a few times where I've
persuaded someone to release an image under GFDL (rather than not at
all) by showing them how hard it would be for someone to legally use
the image outside of a Wikipedia context, especially a print one.
-Matt