[WikiEN-l] How is validation supposed to work?

[Ray Saintonge]

Magnus Manske wrote:

>geni wrote:
>  
>
>>On 11/24/05, Andrew Gray <shimgray at gmail.com> wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>On 24/11/05, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>      
>>>
>>>>>P.S.: What's so bad about knowing that people like our article about
>>>>>exploding whales?
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>Because it would mean they were not that interested in our articles on canals.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>There's an awful lot of articles on the net about canals. There's
>>>entire academic courses at MIT you can go and read about canals, or a
>>>thousand and one good bits of writing, pitched at the right level,
>>>discussing canals. There's one good article on the net about exploding
>>>whales.
>>>
>>>Why be ashamed we have that one good article that they *can't* go
>>>elsewhere and read?   
>>>      
>>>
>>Because you can never have too many pages on canals.
>>    
>>
>Relating to a recent thread on wikipedia-l, I hereby demand an article
>on every canal in the world, present or past!
>
Obviously the one on root canal should be a candidate for feature 
article. :-)