On 11/16/05, Jtkiefer <jtkiefer(a)wordzen.net> wrote:
My suggestion is just to ignore them, the guardian
has, is, and most
likely be anti Wikipedia though for the life of me I don't know why
they're so anti-us.
The Guardian absolutely is not opposed to Wikipedia at all. This
statement is apparently an utterly ludicrous overreaction to a pretty
good attempt by the Guardian to establish how reliable Wikipedia is,
by referring selected articles on traditional encyclopedia subjects to
experts in their relevant field.
Does failure to fall drooling at our feet now count as opposition?