[WikiEN-l] Re: Lauritsen speedy deletion??

[MacGyverMagic/Mgm]

> lawyeristic discussions. Then, when someone comes around to writing it
> again, they'll probably say, "well, it was already speedy deleted earlier".
> Well, no shit, you never bothered to look into it in the first place.
>
> darin

If something was speedied as no asserting notability it cannot be
deleted for being a recreation. It needs to be sufficiently similar or
there must have been a discussion on AFD which established it
shouldn't have an article at all.

Mgm