I think that this is exactly right, and also implies that we may want to be
proactive about other long lists of data or magazine rankings that we are
keeping on Wikipedia at the moment. I believe there is some conversation at
the Village Pump about the larger magazine-published list concern.
Jkelly
Quoting Tony Sidaway <f.crdfa(a)gmail.com>om>:
Not sure how far they can take this. Surely we can
say "X reached
number 4 in the Billboard Hot 100 in November, 2002". Some of those
lovingly crafted chronological tabulations are going to have to go.