[WikiEN-l] Re: Totally unscientific investigation...

[Poor, Edmund W]

> > Yes, I'm an eventualist.  From my point of view, Wikipedia 
> has a long, 
> > long way to go, and that's not a bad thing.  It's that the 
> sum total 
> > of useful human knowledge is so vast.  There are many subject areas 
> > that Wikipedia's coverage is scant or wholly lacking.  Yet, at the 
> > same time, there are articles on Wikipedia that are better than ANY 
> > other online resource.  I am sure there are some that are 
> better than 
> > ANY published article, on or offline.  Isn't that something to feel 
> > good about?

I would feel good about it, if I believed it. <sarcasm>Please list BOTH
of the articles you're referring to. </sarcasm>

If there are several, or even dozens or hundreds of such articles, I'm
sure ALL of our readers would like to know which ones they are. Is there
a [[Category:Best online article]] or something? 

Ed Poor
Quality Control Expert