On 11/15/05, Tony Sidaway <f.crdfa(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This doesn't seem very satisfactory to me.
I'm always bumping into
people who know nothing about lisp except that they don't like the
language's ubiquitous brackets and they consider this to be such a
grave failing in a programming language that it renders lisp almost
useless, and that lisp is an interpretive language that must always be
slow in execution. Should the articles about programming languages
then be exiled to a specialist wiki?
That is not myy point. I'm sure you can hadle these people. Others
perhaps cannot. Forks also allow the coverage of unencyopedic topics
until they become encyopedic
It is certainly true that a specialist is better able
to detect
hoaxes, but I don't see how this can be used as an argument for moving
all articles about programming languages, web comics, pokemon or
whatever to a specialist wiki, which would almost inevitably have
fewer editors competent in the subject than the much larger and more
popular English language Wikipedia. It is also the case that I'm
competent in rather more subjects than programming languages, so it
would be very inconvenient to deal with a number of fragmented wikis.
Hoaxes aren't common enough to justify splitting the wikipedia, nor is
the presence of the odd blithering ignoramus a problem.
Where did I suggest splitting the wiki?
There are a number of wikimedia projects. If other groups want to
carry out projects who are we to stop them?
--
geni