[WikiEN-l] Re: Arbitration Committee members granted checkuser tool

[Alphax (Wikipedia email)]

David Gerard wrote:
> Chris Jenkinson wrote:
> 
> 
>>As both of you would face legal recourse if you were to divulge private
>>information in your day jobs, what do you think the opposition to having
>>a comparable legal agreement between the Foundation and people with
>>checkuser is due to, given that the situation is reasonably similar?
> 
> 
> 
> What, like all the devs, you mean? The volunteer sysadmins? I'd weigh
> up the possibility they'd say "buggre alle this" and just walk. Don't
> let me hold you back from this excellent and cautious idea, though.
> 
> Would anyone favour the idea of me just handing back the CheckUser
> bit? I'm this >< close.
> 
> 

No! We need you! You're sane! You know network stuff!

-- 
Alphax - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphax
Contributor to Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
"We make the internet not suck" - Jimbo Wales
Public key: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphax/OpenPGP
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 546 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/attachments/20051114/89a7e501/attachment.pgp