You disruptively attempted to close an AfD on an
article that falls into
your area of ... what's that word that isn't "obsession" but means the
same thing? You did so four times. You then voted "speedy keep", with
your first sentence being the same as your edit summary.
Have you looked at the article in question? I don't know about others,
but to me it's a blatantly obvious speedy keep. People obviously keep
the AfD discussion going only because it's "accepted practice" or
"policy" or whatever you call it this time. If anyone actually sat down
and thought about what we really want, it would be a speedy keep.