Jack Lynch wrote:
I certainly agree, it is statements made by the
arbiter, not by the
defendant, which concern me.
"That is not an RfC, it's a rant by a known troublemaker. I see no
reason to participate in such a clearly broken process."
(regarding an RfC initiated by Silverback)
\
Let's check the outrage at the door and discuss this reasonably, ok?
Hyperbolic screaming does not benefit your cause. Kelly Martin (talk)
12:54, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
etc...
Jack (Sam Spade)
I haven't seen the 'etc' but I would not consider the above remark to be
even remotely close to the sort of thing that would cause me to urge an
arbiter to recuse from a case. It was _not_ an RfC, it _was_ a rant by
a known troublemaker. Checking outrage at the door and avoiding
hyberbolic screaming _are_ good ideas.
--Jimbo