On 11/13/05, Jimmy Wales <jwales(a)wikia.com> wrote:
Nonetheless, my correspondent asks me an interesting
question: where do
we draw the line?
As a practical matter, I think what we follow is a non-policy in this
area, that is to say, we follow the same exact policies we follow for
all sorts of information: is it verifiable, is it NPOV?
I don't think we should treat personal information any differently to
any other information. If there is evidence, cite it. If that
evidence is not good enough, then the name *cannot* go in the article.
Our verifiability policy already provides for this. Example: we can
say that Bill Bryson was born and grew up in Des Moines, because he
says so in his books. We could also say that his wife is British,
because he says so in his books. However, we could not publish his
current home address, or the names of his children, becuase these have
never been quoted elsewhere.
Basically, the presence of someone's name/personal information in
Wikipedia should never increase their danger. The information should
only go in if it is already incontrovertibly in the public domain.
WP:V and WP:NOR provide for this. The person's information would
already be in the public domain, so there's no worry about keeping it
there.
My own opinion is that in most cases we should publish
real names if any
mainstream media outlet has done so first. We should not (usually)
regard blogs and hate sites as sufficiently reliable confirmation for
real names. We never post anyone's home address (since this is just
totally unencyclopedic and irrelevant to our mission anyway), though of
course there could be some bizarre exceptions I suppose.
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington D.C.
20500
USA
Sam